Core-Self Pruning: How Micro-Aggression Fragments the DNA-Self

Photo by Margarita Shtyfura on Unsplash

Core-Self Pruning: How Micro-Aggression Fragments the DNA-Self

Introduction: The DNA-Self Theory

The DNA-Self theory proposes that each new-born enters the world with a pre-populated schema network, this is a complete developmental blueprint encoded in genetic material, shaped by prenatal environment, containing latent traits, skills, and associated needs awaiting activation through exploration. This DNA-Self represents the authentic core: a self-concept schema driven by innate potential rather than social conditioning. Unlike traditional schema theory, which assumes schemas form exclusively through experience, DNA-Self theory argues that experience selectively activates or suppresses pre-existing genetic potentials. pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih​

The Mechanism of Core-Self Pruning

Core-self pruning is the active, ongoing process where micro-aggressions; subtle humiliations disguised as “games,” “teasing,” or “constructive criticism”, tend to force children to excise or reject authentic self-components from their dominant self-concept schema. Each micro-aggression creates a mask overlay: a protective inhibition that redirects behaviour toward social acceptability. schematherapysociety​

Consider the child exploring artistic expression. When perhaps,  peers snigger at their work, and the teacher fails to intervene, the child doesn’t merely feel embarrassed, they may prune the artistic self-schema that they hold to “blame”, for that embarrassment, from their core identity.

The neural pathway connecting “I am someone who creates” to motor execution gets tagged as threat-associated, and the brain reduces metabolic investment in that circuit. The skill isn’t lost; it’s exiled from the core self-concept. psychalive

With the Theory of the DNA self, we see the evolution of a child’s character as typically being a death of the authentic-self, via 1,000 “cuts”; multifaceted, seemingly random microaggressions that cause incremental and almost unnoticeable change in the child’s character.

Every microaggression, if taken to heart, and held within a self-blame context, will cause their true-self to be pruned, and this will then create an ego-based mental construct, that enforces this disconnect. This is how the child first starts to develop its ego. Some children have to cope with multiple microaggressions every day.

Over time, true-self qualities are replaced with false-self ego structures, which ultimately drive neediness and dependency, loss of confidence and self-esteem.​

Schema Theory’s Blind Spot

Mainstream schema therapy correctly identifies that childhood abuse creates Early Maladaptive Schemas like Defectiveness/Shame and Abandonment. However, it fundamentally misunderstands the mechanism: attachmentproject​

Error #1: Assuming a pre-existing “Healthy Adult” mode waiting to be strengthened. For chronic micro-aggression survivors, no such mode exists—authentic self-schemas were pruned before they could mature into stable modes. Almost every child has suffered a great many of those microtraumas and been told to “grow-up”, many times, long before they were diagnosed for depression, anxiety, and every mental health problem they may eventually present. pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih​

Error #2: Treating maladaptive schemas as “distortions“ rather than accurate maps of a distorted environment. When a child learns “my needs are unacceptable,” this isn’t cognitive distortion, it’s pattern recognition of consistent environmental feedback, and the longer it experiences these multidimensional micro rejections of normal needs, the more it will avoid future rejections, by ignoring, or otherwise dissociating those needs. As these functions are often DNA based, those dissociations, or forgetting’s, can include autonomic functions such as self-regulation. This is where our addictions come from, this is where our intense need for distractions comes from. reformingtraumacoaching​

Error #3: Missing the pruning mechanism. Schema theory describes schemas as forming through experience, but DNA-Self theory reveals they are selected against through micro-aggression. The child isn’t building a defective schema; they’re dismantling a functional one in order to survive.

The Micro-Aggression Cascade

Each micro-aggression triggers a three-level pruning cascade:

• Immediate inhibition: The child suppresses the specific behaviour (artistic expression, enthusiastic movement, boundary-setting) pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih​
• Generalization: The inhibition spreads to related traits (“enthusiasm is dangerous,” “vulnerability is shameful”) traumaresearchuk​
• Self-concept reorganization: The pruned trait is removed from the child’s explicit self-concept schema, leaving a hollow space that feels like “I don’t know who I am”. That hollow space, is the space that drives a maladaptive attachment style, into a personality disorder.

When the child seeks parental validation and finds distraction or dismissal, the pruning deepens. The child learns: nowhere is safe for authenticity. The DNA-Self’s genetic potentials; artistic motor patterns, assertive communication styles, emotional expressiveness etc., are actively suppressed rather than naturally explored or expressed. pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih​

From Pruning to False Ego

As authentic traits are pruned, the false ego emerges as a collection of appeasement behaviours. Each pruned authentic need creates a compensatory mask:

• Pruned need for autonomy → Overcompensatory “people-pleaser” mode
• Pruned emotional expression → “Detached protector” mode
• Pruned boundary-setting → “Compliant surrenderer” mode schematherapysociety​

These masks aren’t superficial; they become the ego itself. The child introspects on their own appeasement behaviours and concludes: “This is who I am.” The false ego is learned, reinforced, and self-perpetuating, while the DNA-Self’s traits lurk in shadow, disconnected from the individuals conscious identity. thesap

This is an important point. Many people think they understand their mask. because they are aware of it, and need it, in order to protect what they consider to be their “true-self“. However,  DNA-Self theory strongly suggests that children tend to forget their bad memories, and that forgetting means that they forget the act of creating the related self-suppressing mask-rule, and through repetition, behaviourism tells us, eventually, we will accept that learnt response as that hidden mask under the mask of the false-self, that the individual thinks is true. The mask is a compulsive, potentially unknown and unrecognised behaviour, that their known mask only amplifies.​

The Hollow Self and Attention-Seeking

By middle childhood, the pruned self-concept schema feels hollow. The child experiences a chronic sense of neediness, not because they’re inherently needy, but because their DNA-Self’s legitimate needs (for validation, expression, autonomy) were systematically pruned by their reaction to their early childhood experiences. psychalive​

The child may then, for example appease others to fill this void, having learned that:

• Direct expression of needs = punishment
• Meeting others’ needs = temporary safety and pseudo-connection traumaresearchuk​

This creates the appeasement addiction cycle: the child becomes hypervigilant to others’ unspoken desires, not from empathy, but from survival programming. The DNA-Self’s innate social capacities are weaponized into manipulation tools for safety.

Shadow as Repository of Genetic Potential

In Jungian terms, the Personal Shadow doesn’t just contain “bad” impulses, it also holds exiled DNA-Self components: genetic potentials for art, assertiveness, emotional depth, motor fluidity, and creative problem-solving, etc. These aren’t lost; they’re unintegrated, and now in opposition to their original function. Rather than help enable a skill, for example, they will serve to self-sabotage any attempt to use that skill. If it is self-regulation, then in response to a decision to netter regulate ones diet, a person may find themselves unable to fight an increase in gnawing hunger. A hunger driven by a need to somehow appease that hollowness that they feel inside. Their lack of wholeness. simplypsychology​

The shadow’s self-sabotage isn’t malice, it’s a genetic potential trying to express itself through a false ego that can’t accommodate it. The artist’s hand-eye coordination triggers “anxiety” in the accountant’s rigid role. The assertive communicator’s vocal patterns emerge as “anger issues.” The dancer’s movement impulses cause “clumsiness” in the inhibited body. pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih​

The Robot Factory: Misattributing Trauma as Core

Unfortunately, given our current schooling system, and it’s lack of awareness for the impact of this toxicity on our children, not to mention the parents and caregivers, who often as a large part of that childhood toxicity, we are training children to be low-grade robots. When a child shows “natural” compliance, emotional flatness, or perfectionism, psychology calls these “traits” or “temperament.” In reality, they are successfully installed operating systems that prevent the DNA-Self’s hardware from running. reformingtraumacoaching​

The “skill loss” and “regulation loss” diagnosed in trauma survivors aren’t deficits, they’re developmental preventions, and they have a huge impact on the intelligence and autonomy of the child. They mostly emerge from school, victims of long term abuse, suffering from C-PTSD, while being trained to smile, and repeat robotically that they are fine. To hide the pain behind every false smile, just to they won’t dream of much more than a life at McDonalds, and somehow keep that lying smile, until they die.

The child never lost these capacities; they were pruned before maturation. Psychology’s error is assuming they were never there, rather than recognizing they were actively suppressed by micro-aggressive environments. traumaresearchuk​

Reclaiming the DNA-Self

Recovery requires reversing the pruning process: systematically identifying pruned DNA-Self components, safely reactivating them, and rebuilding the core schema around authentic expression rather than appeasement. This isn’t “finding yourself”, it’s reconstructing a self that childhood micro-aggression systematically dismantled.

Currently we are working on our own method of recovering this lost authentic, DNA-Self, against a context of impulsivity, so strong, that it cannot be interrupted by the individual suffering from it. We have already observed a number of mechanisms in use, and tools that help. But, we think that our non-verbal binary switching therapy SwitchStep, will be most effective for most people, with some additional informed tweaks. So watch this space.

The DNA-Self theory demands we recognize: every child is born with a complete authentic blueprint, as this aspect is undeniable, and a clear omission to current thinking. Our social systems aren’t “shaping” them, they’re selectively destroying the parts that don’t serve conformity. The hollow, needy, appeasing child isn’t the authentic core, it’s the survivor of a thousand tiny cuts to the DNA-Self.

References