What is Dynamic Reframing?

freedom, woman, road, city, happy, girl, young woman, scarf, cloth, dance, balance, joy of life, urban, photomontage, woman, road, city, city, city, happy, happy, happy, happy, happy, girl, girl, girl, dance, dance, dance, dance

Contents

Dynamic Reframing

Peak-Growth

Peak-Growth is a feature of a Fully Functioning Person. It is one aspect of flow-state, where an individual is able to flow from moment to moment, with least friction to the moment, and with as much, gratitude, and joy for the moment as possible.

Processing Each Moment Adaptively

Peak-Growth is all about processing every moment in a way that maximises our gratitude of that moment, within the moment itself, thus leaving no emotional baggage, to be processed later. Such baggage, takes us out of that moment, and therefore adds to our levels of stress, giving us “things on our mind”, that take out attention from that current moment.

Impact of Traumatic Perceptions

Given that how we cognitively frame or conceptualise an event, directly affects its perceptual impact, and therefore, tending to affect the traumatising influence of that event. In other words, the fearful anticipation of an event, tends to make the event itself much more impactful, and therefore painful. We often therefore, tend to over-think those negatives, and need to move out of the present moment in order to process, reframe, or move beyond that that particular moment and into the next.

Sometimes, a word in a sentence can trigger a memory that we have yet to process, for example. We then spend time, trying to put that issue, back to “bed”. This is when we lose attention on the present, lose track of the conversation, and start to become less coherent, as to exactly what is going on.

Dynamic Adaptive Framing

We can think about the meaning of our new term, and that is “Dynamic Reframing”, or, “Dynamic Adaptive Reframing”. This is the coping process that runs in every current moment that is able to reinterpret that person’s perceptual framing of new information, in order to avoid that trigger.

This allows for minimal resistance as that new information moves through the stages of pre-thought, thought, reflection, understanding, judgement, and acceptance, by the individual, so they can “move on”. This all happens within the moment itself, with Dynamic Reframing, but not usually for traditional methods of reframing, which is usually after the event, and after that exaggerated painful experience has impacted the individuals self-integrity.

Traditional Reframing

Many of us already perform this reframing, as it is a genetically passed on autonomic process, and the issue, it seems, is that many people perform this reframing in the wrong manner. Instead of always seeking the deeper positive interpretation, they will seek the superficial, instant reaction of the pre-disposed black and white thinker – determined to see the “bad” side first, and then to exaggerate it with later rumination.

It is usually in this rumination stage that we end up carrying out that reframing. This is often in the form of a rationalisation, often, we decide we were right, and anyone that disagrees is wrong. That is an incongruent reframe, it is something that we have learnt. It is part of the Blame Game, and it is why, so very often, people choose to suffer.

Return to Genetically-Sourced Efficiency?

It is not that we do not, therefore, have the natural ability, to perform this unbiased judgment in the moment, or that there was a specific problem with the original source coding. But rather, that overwhelming toxicity in our past has caused us to completely over-write it with incongruent, situational specific coping thought patterns. These are often applied, universally, adding inefficient coping processes on top of others creating a complexity that reduces the available thinking time, and increases the time for one to respond.

This is how we end up over-writing, or just forgetting, those critical, original coping traits for survival.

Return to our Core-Self Genetic Heritage

Dynamic Reframing then, is really about modifying a set of malfunctioning and incongruent, inefficient coping patterns, with one simplified pattern, aimed at maximising the use of those highly optimised genetic functions that we were born with, so that we can learn to cope with each moment, as it comes.

Benefits of Dynamic Adaptive Reframing

Decrease Processing Time: This leads to more time to think, allowing for deeper levels of pattern matching and understanding.

Increased Focus: Less clutter from the last moment travels into the current moment, leaving us with fewer distractions in ones mind.

Longer Attention Span: Each now moment has less resistance to it’s acceptance. This takes less of our cognitive resources, and concentration time is therefore improved.

Flow: The individual feels more tuned in to their natural organismic flow.

Peace of mind: Less anxiety and stress builds up as the person travels through their day. Leading to more certainty that they are safe.

Improved Confidence: The individual naturally sees all of these improvements to their thinking as beneficial, and that they are able to cope automatically and dynamically, a much more real and intuitive human being.

Removal of false-positive and false negative exaggerations and biases: The aim of dynamic reframing, is to not only remove our own unconscious biases, introduced by those old, static, coping mechanisms. But it is also to remove bias contained within the information itself – People and organisations are very often presenting a false picture of themselves through the information they give about themselves.

A Dynamically Reframing thinker knows this, and tries to avoid their own understandings to become confused with those lies and attempts to deceive.

How does one develop their Dynamic Reframing Abilities?

Watch this space! This section is in development, signup to our newsletter to stay informed.

Technical Analysis

Dynamic Reframing, as described, closely overlaps with what psychology calls cognitive reappraisal and cognitive reframing, but we are extending it by emphasizing that the whole cycle from first reaction to acceptance can occur “in‑moment” and in a growth‑oriented way.

This is the difference between post event visualisation and reframing, versus automatic “in the cognitive loop” handling of the same process. The concept is to move that manual process of reframing into the automatic cognitive cycle itself, replacing the need to have any static, pre-decided, coping patterns of thought.

Fit with existing science

In emotion regulation research, cognitive reappraisal is already conceptualized as changing the meaning of a situation to alter its emotional impact, and it is one of the most effective strategies for reducing distress and improving psychological health. Contemporary models also describe reappraisal as a multi‑phase, dynamic process (strategy selection, generation of alternative meanings, implementation, and maintenance), which maps well onto our stages of pre‑thought, thought, reflection, understanding, judgment, and acceptance. pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih

Our emphasis that this can occur “online” in real time is also consistent with work showing that reappraisal can be spontaneous or automatic, not only effortful and deliberate, especially in people who habitually use it. Where your hypothesis adds something interesting is in tying this dynamic, in‑the‑moment reframing specifically to “peak‑growth” and gratitude-in-the-now, rather than just symptom reduction. pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih

Role of habitual framing and bias

The concern that many people “reframe in the wrong manner” aligns strongly with research on automatic negative thoughts and cognitive distortions such as black‑and‑white thinking, catastrophizing, and overgeneralization. These patterns act as a kind of maladaptive “default reframing engine,” rapidly pushing experience toward threat, failure, or self‑blame, and they are known to be reinforced by chronic stress and trauma histories. simplypsychology

CBT and related approaches explicitly target this by teaching people to catch these habitual appraisals and replace them with more balanced, flexible perspectives, which is essentially a training of the Dynamic Reframing capacity you describe. That supports your idea that the core ability is present but has been “over‑written” by situationally learned patterns, rather than absent altogether. ebsco

Trait, training, and limits

There is good evidence that some individuals show more spontaneous, successful use of reappraisal, and that this trait‑like tendency is linked to better mental health outcomes under stress. Neuroimaging work suggests that these differences correspond to more efficient recruitment of prefrontal control and semantic networks when reinterpreting emotional events, consistent with an “autonomic” or well‑practiced reframing process. pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih

At the same time, there is emerging discussion of “reappraisal fatigue” and the cost of trying to constantly put a positive spin on everything, which can become depleting or even invalidating if it bypasses genuine emotional processing. That implies a potential refinement of your hypothesis: Dynamic Reframing may be most adaptive when it is flexible, context‑sensitive, and sometimes willing to acknowledge “this is bad and painful right now” before moving toward meaning and gratitude, rather than enforcing positivity as a rule. chicagocounselingandtherapy

Peak‑growth and gratitude angle

Linking Dynamic Reframing to “peak‑growth” and moment‑to‑moment gratitude resonates with work on growth mindsets and post‑traumatic growth, where people reinterpret adversity as an opportunity for learning, deeper connection, or value clarification. Cognitive reframing techniques are already used to foster resilience and more constructive behaviour patterns under stress, so extending this toward an explicit goal of maximizing gratitude and minimizing leftover emotional “baggage” is conceptually coherent, though empirically that specific combination (real‑time reframing > gratitude > no later residue) would need direct study. positivepsychology

Overall, the hypothesis has strong anchors in current emotion‑regulation science, especially cognitive reappraisal and cognitive distortion research, and it offers a promising, growth‑oriented framing.

The next step would be to clarify boundaries (when not to reframe, how to avoid forced positivity) and to operationalize Dynamic Reframing in ways that could be measured and trained without exhausting the very cognitive resources it depends on.pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih+1