An image of a patient, and checklist and a picture of the working of the mind, to illustrate an article about the Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Click below to listen to this article:


The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) is a publication by the American Psychiatric Association (APA) that provides standardized criteria for the diagnosis and classification of mental disorders. The DSM is widely used by clinicians, researchers, policymakers, and insurance companies in the United States and internationally. The DSM aims to improve the reliability and validity of psychiatric diagnoses, as well as to facilitate communication and collaboration among mental health professionals. The DSM also reflects the current state of knowledge and research in the field of psychiatry (American Psychiatric Association, 2013).

The DSM has undergone several revisions since its first edition in 1952. The most recent edition, the DSM-5, was published in 2013 and contains 20 chapters that cover various categories of mental disorders, such as neurodevelopmental disorders, schizophrenia spectrum and other psychotic disorders, bipolar and related disorders, depressive disorders, anxiety disorders, obsessive-compulsive and related disorders, trauma- and stressor-related disorders, dissociative disorders, somatic symptom and related disorders, feeding and eating disorders, elimination disorders, sleep-wake disorders, sexual dysfunctions, gender dysphoria, disruptive, impulse-control, and conduct disorders, substance-related and addictive disorders, neurocognitive disorders, personality disorders, paraphiliac disorders, and other mental disorders.

Each chapter includes a description of the disorder category, diagnostic criteria, specifiers, subtypes, severity measures, associated features, differential diagnosis, comorbidity, prevalence, development and course, risk and prognostic factors, culture-related issues, gender-related issues, suicide risk, functional consequences, and treatment options. The DSM-5 also includes three sections that provide additional information and resources for clinicians: Section II: Assessment Measures; Section III: Emerging Measures and Models; and Appendix: Highlights of Changes from DSM-IV to DSM-5 (American Psychiatric Association, 2013).

The DSM is not a definitive source of truth or a substitute for clinical judgment. It is a tool that should be used with caution and flexibility, considering the individual context and needs of each patient. The DSM is also subject to limitations and criticisms, such as its reliance on a categorical rather than a dimensional approach to diagnosis; its potential for overdiagnosis or underdiagnosis of certain conditions; its lack of cultural sensitivity or specificity; its susceptibility to political or economic influences; its inconsistency with other diagnostic systems such as the International Classification of Diseases (ICD); and it’s lagging the rapid advances in neuroscience and genetics (Frances & Widiger, 2012).

Sign up for our Newsletter!
We will send you regular updates regarding new articles, as well as hints and tips regarding self-transcendence. We aim to limit this to once per month, though some months we will have additional special editions covering significant articles worthy of being the sole focus of a newsletter. There will be no sales spam or selling your address to third parties.
Structure of DSM 5

The DSM-5 has a hierarchical structure, with three main levels: chapters, categories, and disorders. Chapters are broad groups of disorders that share common features, such as mood disorders, anxiety disorders, or psychotic disorders. Categories are subgroups within chapters that reflect more specific types of disorders, such as depressive disorders, bipolar disorders, or schizophrenia spectrum disorders. Disorders are the smallest units of classification, and they represent distinct clinical conditions that are defined by specific diagnostic criteria, such as major depressive disorder, bipolar I disorder, or schizophrenia (APA, 2013).

The DSM-5 also has a dimensional structure, which means that it recognizes that mental disorders vary in severity and complexity across individuals and across time. The DSM-5 uses several tools to capture this dimensional aspect of mental disorders, such as specifiers, severity ratings, cross-cutting symptom measures, and alternative model sections. Specifiers are additional features that can be added to a disorder diagnosis to indicate subtypes, course patterns, or associated features, such as melancholic features, rapid cycling, or catatonia. Severity ratings are numerical scales that can be used to indicate the level of impairment or distress caused by a disorder, such as mild, moderate, or severe. Cross-cutting symptom measures are self-report or clinician-rated questionnaires that can be used to assess common symptoms that occur across different disorders, such as depression, anxiety, or psychosis. Alternative model sections are optional sections that present alternative ways of conceptualizing and diagnosing certain disorders, such as personality disorders or neurodevelopmental disorders (APA, 2013).

The structure of the DSM-5 reflects the current state of knowledge and evidence about mental disorders, but it is not fixed or final. The DSM-5 is intended to be a living document that can be updated and revised as new scientific findings emerge. The APA has established a mechanism for continuous improvement of the DSM-5 through regular reviews of the literature and feedback from users and stakeholders. The APA also encourages further research and innovation in the field of mental health to advance the understanding and treatment of mental disorders (APA, 2013).

Criticism of the DSM

The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) has also been subject to various criticisms, both from within and outside the field of psychiatry. Some of the main criticisms are:

  • The DSM lacks scientific validity and reliability, as it is based on descriptive criteria rather than biological markers or empirical evidence. The diagnostic categories are often arbitrary, inconsistent, and overlapping, and may not reflect the true nature and diversity of mental disorders (Pickersgill, 2014; Wikipedia, n.d.).
  • The DSM contributes to the medicalization of normal human experiences, such as grief, sadness, anxiety, or anger. It may pathologize cultural differences or social problems, and create unnecessary labels and stigma for people who do not fit the norm. It may also encourage over-diagnosis and over-prescription of psychiatric drugs, influenced by the interests of the pharmaceutical industry (Verywell Mind, 2023; NICS Well, n.d.).
  • The DSM is culturally biased and ethnocentric, as it reflects the dominant Western perspective on mental health and illness. It may ignore or marginalize the cultural context, meanings, and values of non-Western or minority groups, and impose a universal standard that may not be appropriate or relevant for different populations (Wikipedia, n.d.).

These criticisms raise important questions about the role and authority of the DSM in mental health diagnosis, treatment, and research. They also challenge the assumptions and values that underlie the classification and conceptualization of mental disorders. Is the DSM a scientific document or a political one? What research was used to inform its creation and revision? How does it affect the lives and identities of people who are diagnosed with mental disorders? These are some of the issues that need to be critically examined and debated in relation to the DSM.


APA. (2013). Organization of DSM-5. Retrieved from

New article alerts!
We will notify you of new articles as soon as they are published. There will be no sales spam or selling your address to third parties.

APA. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.

Frances A., & Widiger T. A. (2012). Psychiatric diagnosis: lessons from the DSM-IV past and cautions for the DSM-5 future. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology , 8 , 109–130.

NICS Well. (n.d.). News analysis: Controversial mental health guide DSM-5. Retrieved from

Pickersgill, M. (2014). Debating DSM-5: diagnosis and the sociology of critique. Journal of Medical Ethics, 40(8), 521-525.

Verywell Mind. (2023). Pros and cons of the DSM in mental health diagnosis. Retrieved from

Wikipedia. (n.d.). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. Retrieved from

Print Friendly, PDF & Email


Leave a Reply

Avatar placeholder

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Skip to content